Culture and DEIB Movement at International Language Training Organizations in Shanghai and Jakarta

Lingga G. Arieska*, Virienia Puspita, Stephnie Putri Diasti, Radityo Wahyu Senoputro

Abstract


DEIB (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging) initiative is implemented to tackle equity issues in the organization. The studies on this topic discuss the perception of equity campaigns based on the participants’ cultural backgrounds. This article asserts its point of view from a global language training organization that concentrates its DEIB's mission statement by a committee based in Shanghai, China, alongside a representative committee in Jakarta, Indonesia, where the intercultural backgrounds affected the perception of the movement. The symbolic interactionism point of view of how DEIB ran in these two capitals is made through careful observation and interviews with staff. It suggests that a good campaign within the organization should focus on culturally relevant issues. The campaign format is also highlighted as one thing that must be improved. The sense of ‘belongings’ from each staff in different countries could come from how the information caters to them and how their cultural background defines the issues.


Keywords


Culture, Discrimination, Inclusion, DEIB Campaign, Equality, Workplace

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badru, M., Ghofur, A., & Mashadi, M. (2022). Hubungan Antara Daya Inovatif Kepala Sekolah, Budaya Kerja Guru Dan Etos Kerja Guru Terhadap Efektivitas Pembelajaran Di Smk Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Locus Penelitian Dan Pengabdian, 1(6), 466–471.

Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. Sociopedia. Isa, 1(1), 1–17.

Chandel, R., Kumar, V., Kaur, R., Kumar, S., Kumar, A., Kumar, D., & Kapoor, S. (2023). Bioactive compounds, health benefits and valorization of Pyrus pyrifolia (sand pear): a review. Nutrition & Food Science.

Charlesworth, T. E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes: I. Long-term change and stability from 2007 to 2016. Psychological Science, 30(2), 174–192.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Hirsh, E., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2020). Metrics, accountability, and transparency: a simple recipe to increase diversity and reduce bias. What Works? Evidence-Based Ideas to Increase Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Workplace, 16–23.

Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589–617.

Loden, M., & Rosener, J. B. (1991). Workforce America!: Managing employee diversity as a vital resource. Irwin, Professional Publishing.

Lopez-Rocha, S. (2006). Diversity in the Workplace: issues, strategies, and perspectives. International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities, and Nations, 5(5), 11.

Mackenzie, L. N., & Wehner, J. (2023). Context matters: moving beyond “best practices” to creating sustainable change. WHAT WORKS?, 45.

Marwanto, R. (2022). Eksplorasi Work Engagement dalam meningkatkan Fluorishing pada Tenaga Kesehatan di Rumah Sakit Pku Muhammadiyah Sruweng. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 1(8), 883–900.

McKenzie, C. L., & Qazi, C. J. (1983). Communication barriers in the workplace. Business Horizons, 26(2), 70–72.

Naidoo, M. (2016). An ethnographic study on managing diversity in two Protestant theological colleges. HTS: Theological Studies, 72(1), 1–10.

Probst, T. M. (2003). Changing attitudes over time: Assessing the effectiveness of a workplace diversity course. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 236–239.

Raewf, M. B., & Mahmood, Y. N. (2021). The cultural diversity in the workplace. Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 1–6.

Shahparan, M. (2023). The Cultural Conflicts on EM Forster a Passage to India: From Post-Colonial Perspective. Journal of World Science, 2(6), 785–797.

Smithson, J., & Stokoe, E. H. (2005). Discourses of work–life balance: negotiating ‘genderblind’terms in organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 12(2), 147–168.

Sturm, S. (2006). The architecture of inclusion: Advancing workplace equity in higher education. Harv. JL & Gender, 29, 247.

Sutanto, E. M. (2009). Turning Diversity into Competitive Advantage: A Case Study of Managing Diversity in the United States of America. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 11(2), 154–160.

Syed, J., & Èzbilgin, M. F. (2010). Managing cultural diversity in Asia: A research companion. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Woods, D. R., Benschop, Y., & van den Brink, M. (2022). What is intersectional equality? A definition and goal of equality for organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(1), 92–109.

Yang, Y., Chen, Z., & Liu, X. (2021). Gender Stereotyping and Inequality Behind the Slogans: A Case Study in Chinese Tertiary Education. Education as Change, 25, 21-pages.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jimps.v8i4.26980

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

JIMPS: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah indexed by

sinta_logodoaj_logoDimensions_logoCROSSREF_logoROAD_logoPKP_Index_logoGoogle_Scholar_logogaruda_logoonesearch_logoBASE_logoWordcat_logo

___________________________________________________________
JIMPS: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah

E-ISSN 2614-3658
P-ISSN 2964-7231

Published by History Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala in collaboration with "Perkumpulan Prodi Pendidikan Sejarah Se- Indonesia"
W :https://jim.unsyiah.ac.id/sejarah
E : jimsejarah@usk.ac.id

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0