Khilafah Political Controversy in Indonesia

Indra Utama Tanjung

Abstract


This paper aims to investigate the political controversy surrounding the caliphate in Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach, this study explores the perspectives of various stakeholders on the topic, including religious leaders, politicians and the general public. The study also analyzes the historical background and current political environment in Indonesia to understand the context of the controversy, using normative juridical research methods. Indonesia is the world's most populous Muslim country, and the idea of a caliphate has been the subject of political controversy for many years. A caliphate is an Islamic state led by a supreme religious and political leader, known as the caliph, who is considered the successor of the Prophet Muhammad. The concept of the caliphate has been a subject of debate among scholars and political leaders in Indonesia, with some in favor and others opposed. The results show that the controversy surrounding the caliphate in Indonesia is complex and multi-dimensional, with a variety of opinions and perspectives. Some argue that the caliphate is essential for uniting the Muslim world and reviving the prestige of Islam, while others believe that the caliphate is incompatible with the principles of democracy and the diversity of the Indonesian population. The research also emphasizes the role of politics in shaping the debate and the impact of external factors, such as global politics and the actions of Islamic extremist groups. This research contributes to a better understanding of the political controversy surrounding the caliphate in Indonesia and its potential impact on Indonesia's future. The findings can inform policy decisions and provide insights for future research on related subjects.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aly, Sirojuddin. n.d. (2023). “Revitalization of Jihad and Khilafah: A Review for Political Thought of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009934817531760.

Arif, Syaiful.(2020). Tenaga Ahli, Majelis Permusyawaratan, and Rakyat Republik Indonesia. Islam Dan Pancasila Pasca Reformasi. Tashwirul Afkar 39 (2). https://doi.org/10.51716/TA.V38I02.30.

Baidhowi, Baidhowi. (2016). Khilafah in the Context of the State of Pancasila. Law Research Review Quarterly 2 (4): 497–516. https://doi.org/10.15294/SNH.V2I01.21330.

Fatinova, Dede, Ratna Juwitasari Emha, and Yasir Mubarok. (2019). “Representasi LGBT Dalam Perspektif Ideologi Khilafah: Kajian Transitivitas Dalam Buletin Kaffah.” Buletin Al-Turas 25 (2): 343–58.

landoko, Priyo, and Anis Farida. (2021). “In the State Administration System of Indonesia: No Space for Khilafah!” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 77 (4). https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V77I4.6510.

Jaelani jejen. (2015). Kontroversi Khilafah: Islam, Negara, Dan Pancasila. Jurnal Sosioteknologi 14 (2): 139954. https://doi.org/10.5614/SOSTEK.ITBJ.2015.14.2.9.

Konsep Negara Islam, Perbandingan, Analisis KH Pemikiran Syekh Taqiyuddin An-Nabhani dan Abdurahman Wahid, Muhammad Hasanal Muid, Heri Kusmanto, and Indra Fauzan. (2023). “Perbandingan Konsep Negara Islam : Analisis Pemikiran Syekh Taqiyuddin An-Nabhani Dan KH. Abdurahman Wahid.” PERSPEKTIF 12 (1): 196–211. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v12i1.8414.

Kuswanto, Penulis, Bakhrudin Al Habsy, Ihsan Kamil Shari, Moch Mubarok Muharam, Dewi Masitah, Zainal Abidin Ahmad, Nensy Triristina, et al. n.d. (2023). “Pancasila Dalam Perspektif Multi Dimensi.”

Nalle, Victor Imanuel. (2017). Asas Contarius Actus Pada Perpu Ormas: Kritik Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Hak Asasi Manusia. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 4 (2): 244–62. https://doi.org/10.22304/PJIH.V4N2.A2.

Ni’mah, Qoni’atun. (2022). Konsep Negara Ideal Menurut Front Pembela Islam (Fpi) Dan Korelasinya Dengan Negara Pancasila Indonesi.

Romadlan, Said, and Saidromadlan@ui Ac Id. (2020). Diskursus Negara Pancasila Di Kalangan Muhammadiyah. Jurnal Sosial Politik 6 (1): 1–15.

Setiawan, Muhammad Arief, and Hendra Bagus Yulianto. (2021). Teknik Argumentasi Prof. Mahfud MD Dalam Video Ceramah Yang Berjudul ‘Khazanah Islam: Khilafah Di Negara Pancasila.’” Al-I’lam: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam 4 (2): 34–48. https://doi.org/10.31764/JAIL.V4I2.4316.

Subagyo, Agus. (2020). Implementasi Pancasila Dalam Menangkal Intoleransi, Radikalisme Dan Terorisme. Jurnal Rontal Keilmuan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 6 (1): 10–24. https://doi.org/10.29100/JR.V6I1.1509.

Tanjung Indra. (2018). Studi Komparative Pendirian Negara Khilafah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Medan Agama 0 (0). https://doi.org/10.58836/JPMA.V0I0.3967.

Wibowo, Prihandono. (2020). “SEKURITISASI WACANA KHILAFAH DI INDONESIA.” Jisiera: The Journal of Islamic Studies and International Relations 5 (1): 25–49. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4052347.

Yuniarti Dwi Pratiwi. (2020). Peran Pancasila Sebagai Filter Ideologi Bangsa. DEFENDONESIA 4 (2): 14–27. https://doi.org/10.54755/DEFENDONESIA.V4I2.89.

Zamani, Dzaki Aflah, and Tutik Hamidah. (2021). Islam Dan ISLAM DAN PANCASILA DALAM PERDEBATAN ORMAS-ORMAS ISLAMPancasila Dalam Perdebatan Ormas-Ormas Islam. Risalah, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam 7 (1): 28–43. https://doi.org/10.31943/JURNAL_RISALAH.V7I1.166.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jimps.v8i2.24680

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

JIMPS: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah indexed by

sinta_logodoaj_logoDimensions_logoCROSSREF_logoROAD_logoPKP_Index_logoGoogle_Scholar_logogaruda_logoonesearch_logoBASE_logoWordcat_logo

___________________________________________________________
JIMPS: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah

E-ISSN 2614-3658
P-ISSN 2964-7231

Published by History Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala in collaboration with "Perkumpulan Prodi Pendidikan Sejarah Se- Indonesia"
W :https://jim.unsyiah.ac.id/sejarah
E : jimsejarah@usk.ac.id

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0