THE APPLICATION OF CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY BANKRUPTCY IN THE EXECUTION OF DEBTOR'S ASSETS IN INDONESIA: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

Ani Sairufah, Azhari Yahya

Abstract


Cross-border insolvency is regulated by Law Number 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligations for Payment of Debt (UUK-PKPU) in Indonesia. This law applies to situations where foreign parties are involved and the case extends beyond national and regional borders. The focus of this article is to examine the treatment of assets located abroad. Indonesia follows the territoriality principle, which means that the debtor's assets in foreign jurisdictions cannot be transferred to other countries unless bankruptcy decisions made by those countries are recognized. This study adopts a normative juridical research method to gather relevant materials such as concepts, theories, laws, and regulations pertaining to the subject matter. Due to the varying rules in each jurisdiction, it is challenging to determine the status of assets located in foreign countries. The key issue lies in whether domestic bankruptcy decisions are acknowledged and enforced in other jurisdictions, and vice versa. In conclusion, Indonesia should consider revising its cross-border bankruptcy laws and entering into international agreements or conventions to address these challenges effectively.


Keywords


Cross-Border Insolvency; Bankrupcty; Execution of Debtor Asset; Foreign Element

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adhi Hutama, I. D., & Rudy, D. G. (2020). Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Dengan Harta Pailit Berada Di Luar Negeri. Acta Comitas. Dikutip https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2020.v05.i02.p12

Adinegoro, B., Rusfian, E.,Z., (2023). Advancements Of The Bank Of Indonesia Liquidity Assistance (Blbi) Task Force: Achievements And Challenges, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol 25 (3).

Asnil, Dicky Moallavi. (2018). UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency Sebagai Model Pengaturan Kepailitan Lintas Batas Indonesia Dalam Integrasi Ekonomi ASEAN. Jurnal Hukum. Dikutip https://ujh.unja.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/22/15

Caesar. (2004). Analisis Ketentuan Pilihan Hukum Dan Pilihan Forum Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Lintas Batas (Cross-Border Insolvency): Tinajuan Hukum Atas UU No. 37 Tahun 2004.

Christiani, Theresia Anita. (2016). Normative and Empirical Research Method: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science.

Code, Indonesian Civil. (1948). Indonesian Civil Code, no. 23: 1–229.

Farokhi, F., Skd, Sanusi Sanusi. (2022). Application Of Hardship Rule Under The Unidroit Principles Of International Commercial Contracts In Indonesia, Student Journal International Law, Vol 2 (1).

Firjatullah, D. N., Iqbal, M.P., (2023). Legal Protection For Crypto Assets Investment In Commodity Futures Trading In Indonesia, Student Journal International Law, Vol. 3 (1).

Fuady, Munir.(2005). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Arbitrase. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis.

Gautama, Sudargo. (1987). Pengantar Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia. Cet. 5. Bandung: Binacipta.

Gautama, Sudargo. (2008). Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.

Ginting, Elyta Ras. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan. jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hikmah, Mutiara. (2007). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perdata Internasional Dalam Perkara-Perkara Kepailitan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Juniarta, I Dewa Agung Deandra, and Ida Ayu Sukihana. (2019). Kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia Dalam Eksekusi Aset Debitor Pailit Yang Berada Di Luar Negeri. Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Semaya 7.

Maharany, Arindra. (2011). Tijauan Hukum Terhadap Penerapan Instrumen Hukum Internasional Dalam Pengaturan Kepailitan Lintas Batas Di Indonesia, Singapura, Malaysia, Thailand, Korea Selatan, Dan Jepang. Dikutip https://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20271631s317Tinjauanhukum.pdf

Omar, Paul J. (2008). International Insolvency Law Themes and Perspectives. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.

Rahmawati, Rizka. (2019). Eksekusi Aset Debitor Yang Berada Di Luar Negeri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.

Salsabila, C.P., Eka Kurniasari, (2023). Legal Protection Of Smart Contract In Indonesia With Reference To Dutch Law, Student Journal International Law, Vol. 3 (1).

Simanjuntak, Ricardo. (2004). Ketentuan Hukum Internasional Dalam UU No.4 Tahun 1998. Makalah disampaikan pada rangkaian lokakarya Terbatas Masalahmasalah Kepailitan dan wawasan hukum bisnis lainnya.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (2016). Sejarah, Asas, Dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran. Jakarta: Kencana.

Suhardin, Y., Rolib Sitorus, Hendri Khuan, Sardjana Orba Manullang, Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara. (2023). The Existence Of Trade Secrets As Debt Collateral In Indonesia: Orientation And Implication, kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol 25 (1).

Suryana, Daniel. (2007). Kepailitan Terhadap Badan Usaha Asing Oleh Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia. Bandung: Pustaka Sastra.

Tomasic, Roman. (2005). Insolvency Law In The East Esia. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. (2004). Database Peraturan Bpk RI: 55. Dikutip https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/40784




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sjil.v3i2.26943

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Student Journal of International Law
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala  
Jalan Putroe Phang No.1. Darussalam, Provinsi Aceh, 23111 
Telp: (0651) 7410147, 7551781. Fax: 7551781   
e-mail: sjil@usk.ac.id

ISSN : 2807-8497 (ONLINE)