Ainal Zahra Nabila, Lena Farsia


This paper examines  ExxonMobil's Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs for the remedy of affected people in the crimes against humanity cases that occurred in North Aceh, Indonesia. The method applied to this paper is normative research that describes the case, gathers, and organizes a wide variety of data from the document to produce a report about the role of CSR programs for the remedy of the affected people in crimes against humanity cases committed by the party that is affiliated with the ExxonMobil, (Indonesian National Armed Forces). This paper found that the role of CSR for the remedy of affected people in ExxonMobil crimes against humanity case can be handled by corporate citizenship, which is a limited concept of CSR that comply with international guidance and standard of CSR.


Corporate Social Responsibility; Crimes Against Humanity; ExxonMobil; United Nations Guiding Principle on Business and Human Rights, Aceh.

Full Text:



A. Books and Journals

Audrey Gaughran. (2009). Obstacle to Effective Remedy in Cases of Corporate Abuse of Human Rights. OHCHR Consultation on Business and Human Rights. Palais des Nations.

European Commission. (2012). A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Position Paper.

Han, E. S., & Goleman (et. al). (2008). Keterlibatan ExxonMobil di Pengadilan karena Perannya dalam Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia di Aceh. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) Case Study Series.

Hutabarat, Sonya T., and Pazli Pazli, (2015). Implikasi Pemberlakuan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) PT. ExxonMobil Oil Indonesia Di Aceh Utara. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau, vol. 2. no. 2.

ISO and OECD. (2017). Practical Overview of the Linkages between ISO 26000:2010, Guidance on Social Responsibility, and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Swedish Standards Institute ABNT: 76.

Ken P. Cohen, JB Skjærseth. (2003). ExxonMobil: Tiger or Turtle on Social Responsibility. The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, FNI Report.

Manja Podpečan and Damjan Maletič Matjaž Maletič. (2015). ISO 14001 in a Corporate Sustainability Context: A Multiple Case Study Approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal Vol. 26 No, no. 6: 875.

Nor Hadi. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility, Yogyakarta: Expert.

Ronen Shamir. (2004). Between Self-Regulation and the Alien Tort Claims Act: On the Contested Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility. Law and Society Review 38, no. 4.

Sefriani. (2007). Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Transnasional Terhadap Pelanggaran HAM Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional. Unisia 30 no. 65.

Sefriani. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perusahaan di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. DSpace Repository. Page 3.

B. Laws

Article 7 of Rome Statute of International Criminal Court

Article 9 of Law No. 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Court

Article 74 of Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies

Article 15 paragraph b of Law No. 25 of 2007 concerning Investment

Article 11 paragraph 3 of Law No. 22 of 2001 concerning Petroleum and Natural Gas

Article 40 paragraph 5 of Law No. 22 of 2001 concerning Petroleum and Natural Gas

Guiding Principle 27 of UNGPs

Commentary of Guiding Principle 27 of UNGPs

C. Articles with online sources

Bakri. (2014, October 1). Manfaat Exxon dan Arun belum Terlihat. Retrieved on 13 January 2022, from

Down to Earth. (2001, February). Mobil Aceh Rights Abuse Investigation. Retrieved 20 December 2020, from

Down to Earth. (2001, February). Mobil Aceh Rights Abuse Investigation. Retrieved 20 December 2020, from

ExxonMobil Case Document. (2006, February 16). First Amended Complaint for Equitable Relief and Damages. Retrieved 10 January 2022, from

ExxonMobil Case Documents. (2001, June 11). John Doe et al. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al Case Proceedings. Retrieved 23 May 2021, from

ExxonMobil. (2018, September 4). ExxonMobil Guiding Principle. Retrieved 13 August 2021, from principles#:~:text=We%20commit%20to%20being%20a,safe%20and%20environmentally%20responsible%20operations.

ExxonMobil. (2020, June 3). ExxonMobil Statement on Labor and the Workplace. Retrieved 5 December 2021, from

MY. Aiyub Kadir, (2015) Revisiting Self-determination Conflict Settlements in Indonesia Context, Indonesian Law Review, Vol. 5 (2).

Pacific Oaks College. (2021, September 23). Breaking Down the 4 Types of Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved 24 December 2021, from

R Jannah, S Listriani, (2021) Implementation Of Distinction Principle Concerning The Use Of Armed Drones By United States Of America, Student Journal Of International Law, Vol 1 (2), 135-146. (2003, December 2). Exxon-Mobil Digugat di Pengadilan Federal AS. Retrieved 20 December 2020, from

Wayne State University. (2012). What is Corporate Citizenship?. Retrieved 27 April 2021, from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Student Journal of International Law
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala  
Jalan Putroe Phang No.1. Darussalam, Provinsi Aceh, 23111 
Telp: (0651) 7410147, 7551781. Fax: 7551781  

ISSN : 2807-8497 (ONLINE)